Remote Sensing (Oct 2022)

An Aerial and Ground Multi-Agent Cooperative Location Framework in GNSS-Challenged Environments

  • Haoyuan Xu,
  • Chaochen Wang,
  • Yuming Bo,
  • Changhui Jiang,
  • Yanxi Liu,
  • Shijie Yang,
  • Weisong Lai

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14195055
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 19
p. 5055

Abstract

Read online

In order to realize the cooperative localization of multi-unmanned platforms in the GNSS-denied environment, this paper proposes a collaborative SLAM (simultaneous localization and mapping, SLAM) framework based on image feature point matching. Without GNSS, a single unmanned platform UGV and UAV (unmanned ground vehicle, UGV; unmanned aerial vehicle, UAV) equipped with vision and IMU (inertial measurement unit, IMU) sensors can exchange information through data communication to jointly build a three-dimensional visual point map, and determine the relative position of each other through visual-based position re- identification and PnP (Perspective-n-Points, PnP) methods. When any agent can receive reliable GNSS signals, GNSS positioning information will greatly improve the positioning accuracy without changing the positioning algorithm framework. In order to achieve this function, we designed a set of two-stage position estimation algorithms. In the first stage, we used the modified ORB-SLAM3 algorithm for position estimation by fusing visual and IMU information. In the second stage, we integrated GNSS positioning and cooperative positioning information using the factor graph optimization (FGO) algorithm. Our framework consists of an UGV as the central server node and three UAVs carried by the UGV, that will collaborate on space exploration missions. Finally, we simulated the influence of different visibility and lighting conditions on the framework function on the virtual simulation experiment platform built based on ROS (robot operating system, ROS) and Unity3D. The accuracy of the cooperative localization algorithm and the single platform localization algorithm was evaluated. In the two cases of GNSS-denied and GNSS-challenged, the error of co-location reduced by 15.5% and 19.7%, respectively, compared with single-platform independent positioning.

Keywords