Diagnostics (Nov 2020)

A Novel and Simple Exercise Test Parameter to Assess Responsiveness to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

  • Alina-Ramona Cozlac,
  • Lucian Petrescu,
  • Simina Crisan,
  • Constantin Tudor Luca,
  • Cristina Vacarescu,
  • Caius Glad Streian,
  • Mihai-Andrei Lazar,
  • Andra Gurgu,
  • Angela Dragomir,
  • Emilia Violeta Goanta,
  • Radu Vatasescu,
  • Kandara Mohamed Chahine,
  • Ciprian Rachieru,
  • Dragos Cozma

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110920
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 11
p. 920

Abstract

Read online

This study assessed the value of heart rate recovery index (HRRI), a new parameter of an exercise test, as the predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods: Consecutive patients receiving a CRT device were followed up after implantation and every 6 months. An effort test (ET) was quantified by minimum heart rate/maximum heart rate, as well as acceleration and deceleration times. HRRI was calculated as the ratio between acceleration and deceleration time (AT/DT) and compared to outcome. We used logistic regression to assess the predictive value of HRRI for responders and non-responders to CRT. The area under the curve (AUC) was computed to distinguish between positive and negative outcomes. Results: A total of 109 patients (74 men, mean age 63.3 ± 9.8 years) were analyzed; permanent long-term fusion CRT pacing was possible in 65 patients. Patients were assigned to two groups: responders and non-responders (98/11 patients). During a mean follow-up of 36 months, 545 ETs were performed. HRRI was significantly higher in responders versus non-responders (3.16 ± 2 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, p p p Conclusions: HRRI computation during routine ET is useful for the evaluation of responsiveness to CRT.

Keywords