Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (Feb 2024)

Transcranial magnetic stimulation input–output curve slope differences suggest variation in recruitment across muscle representations in primary motor cortex

  • Lari M. Koponen,
  • Lari M. Koponen,
  • Miles Martinez,
  • Miles Martinez,
  • Miles Martinez,
  • Eleanor Wood,
  • David L. K. Murphy,
  • Stefan M. Goetz,
  • Stefan M. Goetz,
  • Stefan M. Goetz,
  • Lawrence G. Appelbaum,
  • Lawrence G. Appelbaum,
  • Angel V. Peterchev,
  • Angel V. Peterchev,
  • Angel V. Peterchev,
  • Angel V. Peterchev

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1310320
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18

Abstract

Read online

Measurement of the input–output (IO) curves of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to assess corticospinal excitability and motor recruitment. While IO curves have been used to study disease and pharmacology, few studies have compared the IO curves across the body. This study sought to characterize IO curve parameters across the dominant and non-dominant sides of upper and lower limbs in healthy participants. Laterality preferences were assessed in eight healthy participants and IO curves were measured bilaterally for the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), biceps brachii (BB), and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. Results show that FDI has lower motor threshold than BB which is, in turn, lower than TA. In addition, both BB and TA have markedly shallower logarithmic IO curve slopes from small to large MEP responses than FDI. After normalizing these slopes by their midpoints to account for differences in motor thresholds, which could result from geometric factors such as the target depth, large differences in logarithmic slopes remain present between all three muscles. The differences in slopes between the muscles could not be explained by differences in normalized IO curve spreads, which relate to the extent of the cortical representation and were comparable across the muscles. The IO curve differences therefore suggest muscle-dependent variations in TMS-evoked recruitment across the primary motor cortex, which should be considered when utilizing TMS-evoked MEPs to study disease states and treatment effects.

Keywords