Gastroenterology Research and Practice (Jan 2012)

Analysis of Delayed Bleeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Epithelial Neoplasms

  • Shinichi Mukai,
  • Songde Cho,
  • Takahiro Kotachi,
  • Akinori Shimizu,
  • Genta Matuura,
  • Michihiro Nonaka,
  • Toshihide Hamada,
  • Ken Hirata,
  • Toshio Nakanishi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/875323
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2012

Abstract

Read online

Aim. Delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric epithelial neoplasms is a major complication. We investigated factors related to post-ESD bleeding to identify preventive measures. Methods. The study included 161 gastric epithelial neoplasms in 142 patients from June 2007 to September 2010. Post-ESD bleeding was defined as an ulcer with active bleeding or apparent exposed vessels diagnosed by an emergency endoscopy or a planned follow-up endoscopy. We analyzed associations between bleeding and the following factors: age, sex, morphology, pathology, tumor depth, ulcer presence/absence, location, size of the resected lesion, duration of the procedure, the number of times bleeding occurred during ESD, and the use of anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet drugs. Subsequently, we examined characteristics of bleeding cases. Results. Post-ESD bleeding occurred in 21 lesions. Univariate analysis of these cases showed that ulcer presence/absence (𝑃<0.001), middle or lower third lesions (𝑃=0.036), circumference (𝑃=0.014), and a post-ESD ulcer with an extended lesser curve (𝑃=0.009) were significant predictors of bleeding. Multivariate analysis showed that ulcer presence/absence (OR 9.73, 95% CI 2.28–41.53) was the only significant predictor. Conclusion. Ulcer presence/absence was considered the most significant predictor of post-ESD bleeding.