Публічне управління та регіональний розвиток (May 2023)

On expedient changes in the management of the strategic development of the regions of Ukraine in the conditions of war (by the example of Ivano-Frankovsk region)

  • Dmytro Dzvinchuk,
  • Vasyl Hladii,
  • Volodymyr Popovych,
  • Viktor Petrenko

DOI
https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2023.20.06
Journal volume & issue
no. 20
pp. 398 – 422

Abstract

Read online

Using the example of the Ivano-Frankivsk region, the expediency and justified possibilities of making changes in the processes and procedures of public management of the strategic development of the regions of Ukraine in the conditions of wartime, postwar recovery and future development are considered. It has been demonstrated that both in the proposed list of plans of individual working groups of the National Council for the Reconstruction of Ukraine (NCRC), as well as in other public documents, there is no coherent and strategically generalized vision of the country's recovery and development based on a single strategic document for the entire state. This requires the introduction of such changes in the processes and procedures of strategic management that would guarantee that the strategic plans, goals and objectives of individual regions take into account not only the national goals and interests of the region, but also take into account the goals and interests of other regions and interregional entities of the country, which are differentiated into 4 categories: temporarily occupied, de-occupied, front-line and rear. The proposed differentiation requires the transition of the system to the use of the latest management technologies for the agreement and harmonization of strategic goals and interests of representative power, science, business and the public at all levels of the public management and administration system with the simultaneous creation for the integration of intellectual potential and resources of power, business and the public at the bodies public administration of each region at all levels of its administrative hierarchy, the so-called advisory structures of scientific, advisory and educational support for strategic management of sustainable development. The expediency of using the scientific-educational-research laboratory (SNDL) operating within the framework of a higher educational institution for this purpose is shown on the example of scientific and theoretical studies and practical recommendations carried out in such a structure.

Keywords