Rudarsko-geološko-naftni Zbornik (Jan 2019)

APPLICATION OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS IN PREDICTING INITIAL GAS PRODUCTION RATE FROM TIGHT GAS RESERVOIRS

  • Ugwumba Chrisangelo Amaechi,
  • Princewill Maduabuchi Ikpeka,
  • Ma Xianlin,
  • Johnson Obunwa Ugwu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2019.3.4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 34, no. 3
pp. 29 – 40

Abstract

Read online

Driven by advancements in technology, tight-gas field development has become a significant source of hydrocarbon to the energy industry. The amount of data generated in the process is immense as most platforms are now being digitized. Machine learning tools can be used to analyse this data in order to build patterns between several dependent and independent variables. Forecasting initial gas production rates has important implications in the planning production/processing facilities for new wells, affects investment decisions and is an important component of reporting to regulatory agencies. This study is based on the analysis of reservoir rock/fluid properties and selected well parameters to build decision-based models that can predict initial gas production rates for tight gas formations. In this study, two machine learning predictive models; Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Generalized Linear Model (GLM), were used to determine the expected recovery rate of planned new wells. Production data was retrieved from 224 wells and used in developing the model. The results obtained from these models were then compared to the actual recorded initial gas production rate from the wells. Results from the analysis carried out revealed a Mean Square Error (MSE) of 1.57 on a GLM model whereas the ANN model gave an MSE of 1.24. Key Performance Index for the ANN model revealed that reservoir thickness had the highest (36.5%) contribution to the initial gas production rate followed by the flowback rate (29%). The reservoir/fluid properties contribution to the initial gas production rate was 53% while the hydraulic fracture parameters contribution to the initial gas production rate was 47%.

Keywords