Journal of Clinical Medicine (Jul 2024)

Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

  • Tomohito Tanaka,
  • Ruri Nishie,
  • Hikaru Murakami,
  • Hiromitsu Tsuchihashi,
  • Akihiko Toji,
  • Shoko Ueda,
  • Natsuko Morita,
  • Sousuke Hashida,
  • Shinichi Terada,
  • Hiroshi Maruoka,
  • Kohei Taniguchi,
  • Kazumasa Komura,
  • Masahide Ohmichi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133981
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 13
p. 3981

Abstract

Read online

Background: The sentinel lymph node is the first node that cancer cells reach when migrating from the primary site. However, oncological outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) have not been reported for cervical cancer. In this study, oncological outcomes were compared between patients receiving SNB and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLD) for early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: One hundred and four patients with clinical stage 1A2, 1B1, and 2A1 cervical cancer were included in this study. All patients underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical hysterectomy with SNB or PLD. Fifty-two patients with tumors ≤2 cm underwent SNB. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the groups. Results: The median (interquartile range) tumor size was 12 (7–20) mm in the SNB group and 20 (13–25) mm in the PLD group. Lymph node metastasis occurred in one patient in the SNB group and in nine patients in the PLD group. The median follow-up periods were 42 (24–60) and 82 (19–101) months in the SNB group and PLD group, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates were 100% in SNB and 91.5% in PLD. The 3-year OS was 100% in both groups. Conclusions: SNB was sufficient in cervical cancer patients with tumors ≤2 cm, suggesting that PLD might not be necessary for these patients.

Keywords