Detection of Myositis Autoantibodies by Multi-Analytic Immunoassays in a Large Multicenter Cohort of Patients with Definite Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies
Anna Ghirardello,
Mariele Gatto,
Chiara Franco,
Elisabetta Zanatta,
Roberto Padoan,
Luana Ienna,
Nicoletta Gallo,
Margherita Zen,
Ingrid E. Lundberg,
Michael Mahler,
Andrea Doria,
Luca Iaccarino
Affiliations
Anna Ghirardello
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
Mariele Gatto
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
Chiara Franco
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
Elisabetta Zanatta
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
Roberto Padoan
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
Luana Ienna
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
Nicoletta Gallo
Unit of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
Margherita Zen
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
Ingrid E. Lundberg
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital in Solna, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Michael Mahler
Werfen Autoimmunity, San Diego, CA 92131, USA
Andrea Doria
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
Luca Iaccarino
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
Background: The usefulness of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs) for the assessment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) is acknowledged, but laboratory standardization remains a challenge. We detected MSAs/MAAs by multi-analytic line immunoassay (LIA) and particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) in a multicenter cohort of patients with IIMs. Methods: We tested the sera from 411 patients affected with definite IIM, including 142 polymyositis (PM), 147 dermatomyositis (DM), 19 cancer-associated myositis, and 103 overlap myositis syndrome (OM), and from 269 controls. MSAs/MAAs were determined by 16Ags LIA in all sera, and anti-HMGCR by ELISA in 157/411 IIM sera and 91/269 control sera. The analytical specificity of LIA/HMGCR ELISA was compared with that of PMAT in 89 MSA+ IIM sera. Results: MSAs/MAAs were positive in 307/411 (75%) IIM patients and 65/269 (24%) controls by LIA (Odds Ratio 9.26, 95% CI 6.43–13.13, p p = 0.007). Concordance between LIA/HMGCR ELISA and PMAT was found in 78/89 (88%) samples. Individual MSAs detected by LIA were associated with IIM subsets: Jo-1 with PM and OM, PL-12 with OM, Mi-2, TIF1γ, and MDA5 with DM, SRP with PM, and PM/Scl-75/100 with OM (p < 0.001 for all). Conclusions: Since MSAs are mostly mutually exclusive, multi-specific antibody profiling seems effective for a targeted clinical-serologic approach to the diagnosis of IIMs.