Dentistry Journal (Oct 2023)

Mechanical Behavior of Repaired Monolithic Crowns: A 3D Finite Element Analysis

  • Pablo Machado Soares,
  • Lucas Saldanha da Rosa,
  • Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira,
  • Luiz Felipe Valandro,
  • Marilia Pivetta Rippe,
  • Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva,
  • Albert J. Feilzer,
  • Cornelis J. Kleverlaan,
  • João Paulo Mendes Tribst

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11110254
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 11
p. 254

Abstract

Read online

This study evaluated the mechanical behavior and risk of failure of three CAD-CAM crowns repaired with different resin composites through a three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. Three-dimensional models of different cusp-repaired (conventional nanohybrid, bulk-fill, and flowable resin composites) crowns made of zirconia, lithium disilicate, and CAD-CAM resin composite were designed, fixed at the cervical level, and loaded in 100 N at the working cusps, including the repaired one. The models were analyzed to determine the Maximum Principal and Maximum Shear stresses (MPa). Complementary, an in vitro shear bond strength test (n = 10) was performed to calculate the risk of failure for each experimental group. The stress distribution among the models was similar when considering the same restorative material. The crown material affected the stress concentration, which was higher for the ceramic models (±9 MPa for shear stress; ±3 MPa for tensile stress) than for the CAD-CAM composite (±7 MPa for shear stress; ±2 MPa for tensile stress). The shear bond strength was higher for the repaired CAD-CAM resin composite (±17 MPa) when compared to the ceramics (below 12 MPa for all groups), while the repair materials showed similar behavior for each substrate. The stress distribution is more homogenous for repaired resin composite crowns, and a flowable direct resin composite seems suitable to repair ceramic crowns with less risk of failure.

Keywords