Tomography (Oct 2023)

Evaluation of a Deep Learning Reconstruction for High-Quality T2-Weighted Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Timothy J. Allen,
  • Leah C. Henze Bancroft,
  • Orhan Unal,
  • Lloyd D. Estkowski,
  • Ty A. Cashen,
  • Frank Korosec,
  • Roberta M. Strigel,
  • Frederick Kelcz,
  • Amy M. Fowler,
  • Alison Gegios,
  • Janice Thai,
  • R. Marc Lebel,
  • James H. Holmes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9050152
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 5
pp. 1949 – 1964

Abstract

Read online

Deep learning (DL) reconstruction techniques to improve MR image quality are becoming commercially available with the hope that they will be applicable to multiple imaging application sites and acquisition protocols. However, before clinical implementation, these methods must be validated for specific use cases. In this work, the quality of standard-of-care (SOC) T2w and a high-spatial-resolution (HR) imaging of the breast were assessed both with and without prototype DL reconstruction. Studies were performed using data collected from phantoms, 20 retrospectively collected SOC patient exams, and 56 prospectively acquired SOC and HR patient exams. Image quality was quantitatively assessed via signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and edge sharpness. Qualitatively, all in vivo images were scored by either two or four radiologist readers using 5-point Likert scales in the following categories: artifacts, perceived sharpness, perceived SNR, and overall quality. Differences in reader scores were tested for significance. Reader preference and perception of signal intensity changes were also assessed. Application of the DL resulted in higher average SNR (1.2–2.8 times), CNR (1.0–1.8 times), and image sharpness (1.2–1.7 times). Qualitatively, the SOC acquisition with DL resulted in significantly improved image quality scores in all categories compared to non-DL images. HR acquisition with DL significantly increased SNR, sharpness, and overall quality compared to both the non-DL SOC and the non-DL HR images. The acquisition time for the HR data only required a 20% increase compared to the SOC acquisition and readers typically preferred DL images over non-DL counterparts. Overall, the DL reconstruction demonstrated improved T2w image quality in clinical breast MRI.

Keywords