Neurology and Therapy (Feb 2023)

Real-World Effectiveness of Natalizumab Extended Interval Dosing in a French Cohort

  • Juliette Pelle,
  • Anais R. Briant,
  • Pierre Branger,
  • Nathalie Derache,
  • Charlotte Arnaud,
  • Christine Lebrun-Frenay,
  • Mikael Cohen,
  • Lydiane Mondot,
  • Jerome De Seze,
  • Kevin Bigaut,
  • Nicolas Collongues,
  • Laurent Kremer,
  • Damien Ricard,
  • Flavie Bompaire,
  • Charlotte Ohlmann,
  • Magali Sallansonnet-Froment,
  • Jonathan Ciron,
  • Damien Biotti,
  • Beatrice Pignolet,
  • Jean-Jacques Parienti,
  • Gilles Defer

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00440-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 2
pp. 529 – 542

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction Natalizumab, a therapy for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), is associated with a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Over the last several years, practitioners have used off-label extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab to reduce PML risk, despite the absence of a large-scale efficacy evaluation. Methods We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study among adults with RRMS receiving stable standard interval dosing (SID), defined as a ≥ 12-month consecutive period of ≥ 11 natalizumab infusions/year in France. We compared the 12-month risk difference of remaining relapse-free (primary endpoint) between patients who switched to EID (≤ 9 natalizumab infusions) and those who remained on SID, with a noninferiority margin of − 11%. We used propensity score methods such as inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Secondary endpoints were annualized relapse rate, disease progression, and safety. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between patients receiving EID (n = 147) and SID (n = 156). The proportion of relapse-free patients 12 months postbaseline was 142/147 in the EID (96.6%) and 144/156 in the SID group (92.3%); risk difference (95% CI) 4.3% (− 1.3 to 9.8%); p < 0.001 for non-inferiority. There were no significant differences between relapse rates (0.043 vs. 0.083 per year, respectively; p = 0.14) or Expanded Disability Status Scale mean scores (2.43 vs. 2.72, respectively; p = 0.18); anti-JC virus index values were similar (p = 0.23); and no instances of PML were reported. The comparisons using IPTW (n = 306) and PSM (n = 204) were consistent. Conclusion These results support the pertinence of using an EID strategy for RRMS patients treated with natalizumab. Clinical Trials gov identifier (NCT04580381).

Keywords