Revista Árvore (Aug 2024)

LAND COVER EFFECTS ON REGENERANTS DENSITY AND RICHNESS IN RESTORATION TREATMENTS IN THE ATLANTIC RAINFOREST BIOME

  • Alexia Rodrigues Campos Luz,
  • Klécia Gili Massi,
  • Olidan Pocius,
  • Marina Merlo Sampaio de Campos,
  • Edson Luís Santiami

DOI
https://doi.org/10.53661/1806-9088202448263729
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 48

Abstract

Read online Read online

ABSTRACT There is good evidence that the results of a restoration program depend largely on the landscape context. In restoration projects, it is crucial to consider the previous land uses and covers and landscape configuration as they have a significant impact on the entire process, especially seed dispersal and natural regeneration of sites. Thus, the objective of this work was to verify the effect of landscape (i.e., land use) on restoration success of total planting, seed sowing and natural regeneration sites in the Atlantic Forest biome, southeast Brazil. The methodology employed was based on demonstration units of restoration. The focus was on regenerant richness and abundance indicators, along with land use and land cover data (class area) from 2010, 2015, and 2020, obtained from the MapBiomas Project. Generalized linear models and correlation analysis were used for the study. We hypothesize that a landscape with more forest and natural regeneration cover (mosaic of agriculture and pasture) would positively affect regenerants in restored sites, which we only observed for natural regeneration treatment sites. In active restoration treatment sites, mosaic of agriculture and pasture was negatively and farming was positively associated to regenerants. We also found greater density and richness of regenerants in natural regeneration treatment sites than in seed sowing and seedling planting. The influence of the surrounding landscape, particularly mosaic, played a crucial role in this success. In addition, land use cover history, as we observed in classes in the last five and ten years, did explain regenerants in studied sites. Thus, results show that the characterization of landscape context and previous land-use history is essential to understand the limitations to succession and define cost-effective restoration strategies.

Keywords