Frontiers in Veterinary Science (Jul 2024)

Fibroblast activation protein is a cellular marker of fibrotic activity in canine idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

  • Elodie Rizzoli,
  • Constance de Meeûs d'Argenteuil,
  • Aline Fastrès,
  • Elodie Roels,
  • Pierre Janssen,
  • Pierre Janssen,
  • Ellen Puré,
  • Mutien-Marie Garigliany,
  • Thomas Marichal,
  • Thomas Marichal,
  • Thomas Marichal,
  • Cécile Clercx

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1416124
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

Canine idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (CIPF) is a progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease of unknown etiology, afflicting aging West Highland white terriers (WHWTs) and leading to progressive respiratory failure. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), a protease overexpressed in many cancers, is upregulated in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in humans. The aim of this study was to investigate FAP as a marker of active fibrosis in lung biopsies from WHWTs affected with CIPF, as well as the potential of plasmatic FAP as a biomarker. After establishing a scoring system to evaluate the severity and activity of fibrosis on histopathological lung sections, anti-FAP immunohistochemistry was performed on healthy and CIPF samples. FAP expression was characterized using both visual and digital quantitative pathology software analyses and then correlated to fibrosis severity and activity. Levels of plasmatic FAP in WHWTs affected with CIPF were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and compared with healthy dogs. Lung samples from 22 WHWTs affected with CIPF were collected. According to the fibrosis scoring system, they were classified as cases of mild (5), moderate (9) and severe (8) fibrosis and were attributed scores of fibrosis activity. Fifteen healthy lung samples were classified as non-fibrotic. Healthy lung samples were FAP-negative, whereas fibroblasts were FAP-positive in 20 CIPF samples. FAP immunohistochemical expression correlated mildly with fibrosis severity (p < 0.05; R2 = 0.22) but highly with fibrosis activity scores (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.68). Digital image analysis detected a higher percentage of FAP-positive cells in areas of active fibrosis (p < 0.001) and FAP-positive cells were distributed outside mature fibrosis lesions, clustered in active fibrosis areas or scattered within alveolar septa. On the other hand, plasmatic FAP was significantly lower in dogs affected with CIPF compared with healthy dogs (p < 0.01). In conclusion, this study provides a valuable histological scoring system to assess the severity and activity of fibrosis in CIPF. It demonstrates that FAP is a good cellular marker of fibrotic activity in CIPF, and thus constitutes a promising target to be exploited for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Additionally, it suggests that plasmatic FAP, although non-specific, could be altered in CIPF.

Keywords