AIDS Research and Therapy (May 2020)

Programme quality indicators of HIV drug resistance among adolescents in urban versus rural settings of the centre region of Cameroon

  • Joseph Fokam,
  • Armanda Nangmo,
  • Carlson Wandum,
  • Desire Takou,
  • Maria Mercedes Santoro,
  • Anne-Esther Njom Nlend,
  • Francis Ndongo Ateba,
  • Paul Koki Ndombo,
  • Nelly Kamgaing,
  • Cedric Kamta,
  • Andre Essiane,
  • Virginie Lambo,
  • Charles Fokunang,
  • Dora Mbanya,
  • Vittorio Colizzi,
  • Carlo-Federico Perno,
  • Alexis Ndjolo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-020-00270-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The high rate of mortality among HIV-vertically infected adolescents might be favoured by HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) emergence, which calls for timeous actions in this underserved population. We thus sought to evaluate program quality indicators (PQIs) of HIVDR among HIV-vertically infected adolescents on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Methods A study was conducted in the Centre region of Cameroon among adolescents (10–19 years) receiving ART in two urban (The Mother–Child Centre of the Chantal BIYA Foundation, the National Social Welfare Hospital) and three rural (Mfou District Hospital, Mbalmayo District Hospital and Nkomo Medical Center) health facilities. Following an exhaustive sampling from ART registers, patient medical files and pharmacy records, data was abstracted for seven PQIs: on-time drug pick-up; retention in care; pharmacy stock outs; dispensing practices; viral load coverage; viral suppression and adequate switch to second-line. Performance in PQIs was interpreted following the WHO-recommended thresholds (desirable, fair and/or poor); with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Among 967 adolescents (888 urban versus 79 rural) registered in the study sites, validated data was available for 633 (554 in urban and 79 in rural). Performance in the urban vs. rural settings was respectively: on-time drug pick-up was significantly poorer in rural (79% vs. 46%, p = 0.00000006); retention in care was fair in urban (80% vs. 72%, p = 0.17); pharmacy stock outs was significantly higher in urban settings (92% vs. 50%, p = 0.004); dispensing practices was desirable (100% vs. 100%, p = 1.000); viral load coverage was desirable only in urban sites (84% vs. 37%, p < 0.0001); viral suppression was poor (33% vs. 53%, p = 0.08); adequate switch to second-line varied (38.1% vs. 100%, p = 0.384). Conclusion Among adolescents on ART in Cameroon, dispensing practices are appropriate, while adherence to ART program and viral load coverage are better in urban settings. However, in both urban and rural settings, pharmacy stock outs, poor viral suppression and inadequate switch to second-line among adolescents require corrective public-health actions to limit HIVDR and to improve transition towards adult care in countries sharing similar programmatic features.

Keywords