Frontiers in Earth Science (May 2024)
Permeability evolution of fractured coal subject to confining stress and true triaxial stress loading: experiment and mathematical model
Abstract
The accurate elucidation and prediction of coal permeability evolution under stress loading conditions are crucial for coalbed methane production. In this study, flow experiments were conducted on six cylindrical coal samples and four cubic coal samples under both confining and true triaxial stress loading conditions, respectively. The structure and characteristic parameters of the fractures inside each coal sample were obtained using the computed tomography scanning system and image processing technologies. The coal permeability under both types of loading processes was calculated through the transient pulse method. A mathematical model was developed to assess the evolution of coal permeability under true triaxial loading based on the current true triaxial permeability model and fractal theory. The results revealed that during the confining pressure loading, the coal permeability decreased exponentially with effective stress and was effectively described using the SD model. Additionally, the coal permeability initially rapidly decreased, followed by a gradual decrease, and eventually stabilized at a constant value. Particularly, during the first three loading steps, the fracture aperture and corresponding permeability of the six cylindrical coal samples decreased by ∼51.79%–57.83% and ∼38.06%–42.12%, respectively. However, during the final three loading steps, the fracture aperture and corresponding permeability of the six coal samples decreased by ∼18.26%–23.08% and ∼22.15%–26.93%, respectively. Moreover, owing to the various crossing angles of complex fracture networks with each principal stress, the effect of each principal stress on the coal permeability evolution was highly anisotropic during triaxial stress loading. Particularly, the permeability of the ST1 sample decreased by 43.08%, 14.84%, and 42.08% during the loading of each principal stress. Similarly, the permeability of the ST2 sample decreased by ∼65.74%, 14.29%, and 19.97%. The permeability reductions for the ST3 sample were ∼34.03%, 55.85%, and 10.12%, while those for the ST4 sample were ∼35.97%, 46.51%, and 17.52%. The SD model failed to describe these anisotropic effects. Compared with the SD model, the improved model, based on the current true triaxial permeability model and fractal theory, effectively described the anisotropic effect of each principal stress on the permeability of coal samples with complex fracture networks under triaxial stress conditions.
Keywords
