Journal of Translational Medicine (Mar 2018)

Study on the progression types of cancer in patients with breast cancer undergoing eribulin chemotherapy and tumor microenvironment

  • Shinichiro Kashiwagi,
  • Gen Tsujio,
  • Yuka Asano,
  • Wataru Goto,
  • Koji Takada,
  • Katsuyuki Takahashi,
  • Tamami Morisaki,
  • Hisakazu Fujita,
  • Tsutomu Takashima,
  • Shuhei Tomita,
  • Masahiko Ohsawa,
  • Kosei Hirakawa,
  • Masaichi Ohira

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1443-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Recently, the concepts of progression due to pre-existing lesions (PPL) and progression due to new metastasis (PNM) have been proposed to differentiate the progression types of treatment-resistant cancers. Previously, the differences between these two progression types did not affect the determination of treatment strategies since both PPL and PNM are classified as progressive disease based on the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) diagnostic criteria. On the other hand, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are effective when used as indicators for monitoring the immune tumor microenvironment (iTME) in the cancer host, and TILs play an important role as biomarkers in predicting prognosis and therapeutic effects. This study focused on the progression types of cancer in patients undergoing eribulin chemotherapy. In addition, the iTME in individuals with PPL and PNM was evaluated using TILs as a marker. Methods Of the 52 patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who underwent chemotherapy with eribulin, 40 remained in the study, and 12 patients were dropout cases. The antitumor effect was evaluated based on the RECIST criteria using version 1.1. TILs were defined as the infiltrating lymphocytes within tumor stroma and were expressed in proportion to the field investigated. In PPL cases, the high-TIL group was considered as type I and the low-TIL group was classified as type II. In PNM cases, the high-TIL group was considered as type III and the low-TIL group was classified as type IV. Results In 19 cases, individuals with type I progression had significantly longer progression free survival and overall survival (OS) compared to those with type III progression (p = 0.040, p < 0.001, log-rank). Individuals with type I progression had significantly prolonged survival post progression compared to those with type II progression (p = 0.048, log-rank). A multivariate analysis that validate the effect of OS showed that these were independent factors of good prognosis (p = 0.003; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.065) (p = 0.006; HR = 0.105). Conclusions The effects of eribulin chemotherapy suggested that patients with progressive-type breast cancer that proliferates in a good iTME may have a good prognosis.

Keywords