JHEP Reports (Dec 2020)

Gadoxetic acid-based hepatobiliary MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Jens Ricke,
  • Ingo G. Steffen,
  • Irene Bargellini,
  • Thomas Berg,
  • José Ignacio Bilbao Jaureguizar,
  • Bernhard Gebauer,
  • Roberto Iezzi,
  • Christian Loewe,
  • Musturay Karçaaltincaba,
  • Maciej Pech,
  • Christian Sengel,
  • Otto van Delden,
  • Vincent Vandecaveye,
  • Christoph J. Zech,
  • Max Seidensticker

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 6
p. 100173

Abstract

Read online

Background & Aims: SORAMIC is a prospective phase II randomised controlled trial in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It consists of 3 parts: a diagnostic study and 2 therapeutic studies with either curative ablation or palliative Yttrium-90 radioembolisation combined with sorafenib. We report the diagnostic cohort study aimed to determine the accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including hepatobiliary phase (HBP) imaging features compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). The primary objective was the accuracy of treatment decisions stratifying patients for curative or palliative (non-ablation) treatment. Methods: Patients with clinically suspected HCC underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (HBP MRI, including dynamic MRI) and contrast-enhanced CT. Blinded read of the image data was performed by 2 reader groups (radiologists, R1 and R2). A truth panel with access to all clinical data and follow-up imaging served as reference. Imaging criteria for curative ablation were defined as up to 4 lesions 4 lesions significantly more frequently than CT. Conclusions: In HCC, HBP MRI provided a more accurate decision than CT for a curative vs. palliative treatment strategy. Lay summary: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are allocated to curative or palliative treatment according to the stage of their disease. Hepatobiliary imaging using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is more accurate than CT for treatment decision-making.

Keywords