BJGP Open (Sep 2023)

Longitudinal realist evaluation of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team (D-PACT) intervention: protocol

  • Hannah Wheat,
  • Lauren Weston,
  • Tomasina M Oh,
  • Sarah Morgan-Trimmer,
  • Wendy Ingram,
  • Sarah Griffiths,
  • Rod Sheaff,
  • Paul Clarkson,
  • Antonieta Medina-Lara,
  • Crispin Musicha,
  • Stuart Spicer,
  • Obioha Ukoumunne,
  • Victoria Allgar,
  • Siobhan Creanor,
  • Michael Clark,
  • Cath Quinn,
  • Alex Gude,
  • Rose McCabe,
  • Saqba Batool,
  • Lorna Smith,
  • Debra Richards,
  • Hannah Shafi,
  • Bethany Warwick,
  • Reena Lasrado,
  • Basharat Hussain,
  • Hannah Jones,
  • Sonia Dalkin,
  • Angela Bate,
  • Ian Sherriff,
  • Louise Robinson,
  • Richard Byng

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0019
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

Background: Different dementia support roles exist but evidence is lacking on which aspects are best, for whom, and in what circumstances, and on their associated costs and benefits. Phase 1 of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team programme (D-PACT) developed a post-diagnostic primary care-based intervention for people with dementia and their carers and assessed the feasibility of a trial. Aim: Phase 2 of the programme aims to 1) refine the programme theory on how, when, and for whom the intervention works; and 2) evaluate its value and impact. Design & setting: A realist longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation will be conducted in urban, rural, and coastal areas across South West and North West England where low-income or ethnic minority populations (for example, South Asian) are represented. Design was informed by patient, public, and professional stakeholder input and phase 1 findings. Method: High-volume qualitative and quantitative data will be collected longitudinally from people with dementia, carers, and practitioners. Analyses will comprise the following: 1) realist longitudinal case studies; 2) conversation analysis of recorded interactions; 3) statistical analyses of outcome and experience questionnaires; 4a) health economic analysis examining costs of delivery; and 4b) realist economic analysis of high-cost events and ‘near misses’. All findings will be synthesised using a joint display table, evidence appraisal tool, triangulation, and stakeholder co-analysis. Conclusion: The realist evaluation will describe how, why, and for whom the intervention does or does not lead to change over time. It will also demonstrate how a non-randomised design can be more appropriate for complex interventions with similar questions or populations.

Keywords