BMC Nephrology (Dec 2022)

Risk assessment of failure during transitioning from in-centre to home haemodialysis

  • Sabrina-Wong-Peixin Haroon,
  • Titus-Wai-Leong Lau,
  • Gan Liang Tan,
  • Eugene-Hern Choon Liu,
  • Soh Heng Hui,
  • Siao Luan Lim,
  • Diana Santos,
  • Robyn Hodgson,
  • Lindsay Taylor,
  • Jia Neng Tan,
  • FH HHD,
  • Andrew Davenport

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-03039-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Introducing a de-novo home haemodialysis (HHD) program often raises safety concerns as errors could potentially lead to serious adverse events. Despite the complexity of performing haemodialysis at home without the supervision of healthcare staff, HHD has a good safety record. We aim to pre-emptively identify and reduce the risks to our new HHD program by risk assessment and using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to identify potential defects in the design and planning of HHD. Methods We performed a general risk assessment of failure during transitioning from in-centre to HHD with a failure mode and effects analysis focused on the highest areas of failure. We collaborated with key team members from a well-established HHD program and one HHD patient. Risk assessment was conducted separately and then through video conference meetings for joint deliberation. We listed all key processes, sub-processes, step and then identified failure mode by scoring based on risk priority numbers. Solutions were then designed to eliminate and mitigate risk. Results Transitioning to HHD was found to have the highest risk of failure with 3 main processes and 34 steps. We identified a total of 59 areas with potential failures. The median and mean risk priority number (RPN) scores from failure mode effect analysis were 5 and 38, with the highest RPN related to vascular access at 256. As many failure modes with high RPN scores were related to vascular access, we focussed on FMEA by identifying the risk mitigation strategies and possible solutions in all 9 areas in access-related medical emergencies in a bundled- approach. We discussed, the risk reduction areas of setting up HHD and how to address incidents that occurred and those not preventable. Conclusions We developed a safety framework for a de-novo HHD program by performing FMEA in high-risk areas. The involvement of two teams with different clinical experience for HHD allowed us to successfully pre-emptively identify risks and develop solutions.

Keywords