NeuroImage: Clinical (Jan 2024)

Disbalanced recruitment of crossed and uncrossed cerebello-thalamic pathways during deep brain stimulation is predictive of delayed therapy escape in essential tremor

  • Bastian E.A. Sajonz,
  • Marvin L. Frommer,
  • Marco Reisert,
  • Ganna Blazhenets,
  • Nils Schröter,
  • Alexander Rau,
  • Thomas Prokop,
  • Peter C. Reinacher,
  • Michel Rijntjes,
  • Horst Urbach,
  • Philipp T. Meyer,
  • Volker A. Coenen

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 41
p. 103576

Abstract

Read online

Background: Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an efficacious treatment for drug-resistant essential tremor (ET) and the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRT) constitutes an important target structure. However, up to 40% of patients habituate and lose treatment efficacy over time, frequently accompanied by a stimulation-induced cerebellar syndrome. The phenomenon termed delayed therapy escape (DTE) is insufficiently understood. Our previous work showed that DTE clinically is pronounced on the non-dominant side and suggested that differential involvement of crossed versus uncrossed DRT (DRTx/DRTu) might play a role in DTE development. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled right-handed patients under bilateral thalamic DBS >12 months for ET from a cross-sectional study. They were characterized with the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) and Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) scores at different timepoints. Normative fiber tractographic evaluations of crossed and uncrossed cerebellothalamic pathways and volume of activated tissue (VAT) studies together with [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were applied. Results: A total of 29 patients met the inclusion criteria. Favoring DRTu over DRTx in the non-dominant VAT was associated with DTE (R2 = 0.4463, p < 0.01) and ataxia (R2 = 0.2319, p < 0.01). Moreover, increasing VAT size on the right (non-dominant) side was associated at trend level with more asymmetric glucose metabolism shifting towards the right (dominant) dentate nucleus. Conclusion: Our results suggest that a disbalanced recruitment of DRTu in the non-dominant VAT induces detrimental stimulation effects on the dominant cerebellar outflow (together with contralateral stimulation) leading to DTE and thus hampering the overall treatment efficacy.

Keywords