Frontiers in Oncology (Mar 2022)

Clinical Application of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Technology in Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy

  • Meng Wei,
  • Yize Liang,
  • Limei Wang,
  • Zhen Li,
  • Yuanyuan Chen,
  • Zhibo Yan,
  • Danping Sun,
  • Yadi Huang,
  • Xin Zhong,
  • Peng Liu,
  • Wenbin Yu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.847341
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThis study aimed to observe the application and evaluate the feasibility and safety of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence technology in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (LRG).MethodsPatients who underwent LRG & D2 lymphadenectomy at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were included between January 2018 and August 2019. According to whether endoscopic injection of ICG was performed, patients were assigned to the ICG group (n=107) and the control group (n=88). The clinicopathologic features, retrieved lymph nodes, postoperative recovery, and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.ResultsBaseline characteristics are comparable. The ICG group had a significantly larger number of lymph nodes retrieved (49.55 ± 12.72 vs. 44.44 ± 10.20, P<0.05), shorter total operation time (min) (198.22 ± 13.14 vs. 202.50 ± 9.91, P<0.05), shorter dissection time (min) (90.90 ± 5.34 vs. 93.74 ± 5.35, P<0.05) and less blood loss (ml) (27.51 ± 12.83 vs. 32.02 ± 17.99, P<0.05). The median follow-up time was 29.0 months (range 1.5-43.8 months), and there was no significant difference between the ICG group and the control group in 2-year OS (87.8% vs. 82.9%, P>0.05) or DFS (86.0% vs. 80.7%, P>0.05).ConclusionsICG fluorescence technology in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy has advantages in LN dissection, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss. The 2-year OS and 2-year DFS rates between the two groups were comparable. In conclusion, ICG fluorescence technology is feasible and safe.

Keywords