Two-step offer and return of multiple types of additional genomic findings to families after ultrarapid trio genomic testing in the acute care setting: a study protocol
Stephanie Best,
Melissa Martyn,
Ling Lee,
Zornitza Stark,
Ilias Goranitis,
Marc Clausen,
Yvonne Bombard,
Martin Delatycki,
Lilian Downie,
Sebastian Lunke,
Elly Lynch,
Belinda Chong,
Lisette Curnow,
Fiona Lynch,
Sophie E Bouffler,
Ivan Macciocca,
Giulia McCorkell,
Justine E Marum,
Danya F Vears,
Clara L Gaff
Affiliations
Stephanie Best
Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Melissa Martyn
Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Ling Lee
Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Zornitza Stark
Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children`s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Ilias Goranitis
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Marc Clausen
Genomics Health Services Research Program, St Michael`s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Yvonne Bombard
Genomics Health Services Research Program, St Michael`s Hospital Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Martin Delatycki
Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Lilian Downie
Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children`s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Sebastian Lunke
Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children`s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Elly Lynch
Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Belinda Chong
Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Lisette Curnow
Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Fiona Lynch
Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sophie E Bouffler
Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Ivan Macciocca
Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Giulia McCorkell
Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Justine E Marum
Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Danya F Vears
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Clara L Gaff
Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Introduction As routine genomic testing expands, so too does the opportunity to look for additional health information unrelated to the original reason for testing, termed additional findings (AF). Analysis for many different types of AF may be available, particularly to families undergoing trio genomic testing. The optimal model for service delivery remains to be determined, especially when the original test occurs in the acute care setting.Methods and analysis Families enrolled in a national study providing ultrarapid genomic testing to critically ill children will be offered analysis for three types of AF on their stored genomic data: paediatric-onset conditions in the child, adult-onset conditions in each parent and reproductive carrier screening for the parents as a couple. The offer will be made 3–6 months after diagnostic testing. Parents will have access to a modified version of the Genetics Adviser web-based decision support tool before attending a genetic counselling appointment to discuss consent for AF. Parental experiences will be evaluated using qualitative and quantitative methods on data collected through surveys, appointment recordings and interviews at multiple time points. Evaluation will focus on parental preferences, uptake, decision support use and understanding of AF. Genetic health professionals’ perspectives on acceptability and feasibility of AF will also be captured through surveys and interviews.Ethics and dissemination This project received ethics approval from the Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee as part of the Australian Genomics Health Alliance protocol: HREC/16/MH/251. Findings will be disseminated through peer-review journal articles and at conferences nationally and internationally.