Current Oncology (Jul 2023)

Clinical Outcomes in a Large Canadian Centralized CLL Clinic Based on Treatment and Molecular Factors over a Decade

  • Jiayu Yang,
  • Lin Yang,
  • Bryan Tordon,
  • Oliver Bucher,
  • Zoann Nugent,
  • Ivan Landego,
  • Nicole Bourrier,
  • Kelsey Uminski,
  • Kevin Brown,
  • Mandy Squires,
  • Aaron J. Marshall,
  • Sachin Katyal,
  • Salah Mahmud,
  • Kathleen Decker,
  • Marc Geirnaert,
  • David E. Dawe,
  • Spencer B. Gibson,
  • James B. Johnston,
  • Versha Banerji

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30070472
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 30, no. 7
pp. 6411 – 6431

Abstract

Read online

FISH cytogenetics, TP53 sequencing, and IGHV mutational status are increasingly used as prognostic and predictive markers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), particularly as components of the CLL International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI) and in directing therapy with novel agents. However, testing outside of clinical trials is not routinely available in Canada. As a centralized CLL clinic at CancerCare Manitoba, we are the first Canadian province to evaluate clinical outcomes and survivorship over a long period of time, incorporating the impact of molecular testing and the CLL-IPI score. We performed a retrospective analysis on 1315 patients diagnosed between 1960 and 2018, followed over a 12-year period, where 411 patients had molecular testing and 233 patients had a known CLL-IPI score at the time of treatment. Overall, 40.3% (n = 530) of patients received treatment, and 47.5% (n = 252) of patients received multiple lines of therapy. High-risk FISH and CLL-IPI (4-10) were associated with higher mortality (HR 2.03, p = 0.001; HR 2.64, p = 0.002), consistent with other studies. Over time, there was an increase in the use of targeted agents in treated patients. The use of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors improved survival in patients with unmutated IGHV and/or TP53 aberrations (HR 2.20, p = 0.001). The major cause of death in patients who received treatment was treatment/disease-related (32%, n = 42) and secondary malignancies (57%, n = 53) in those who were treatment-naïve. Our data demonstrate the importance of molecular testing in determining survivorship in CLL and underpinning the likely immune differences in outcomes for those treated for CLL.

Keywords