BMC Infectious Diseases (Dec 2011)

Rate and determinants of treatment response to different antiretroviral combination strategies in subjects presenting at HIV-1 diagnosis with advanced disease

  • Esposito Antonella,
  • Floridia Marco,
  • d'Ettorre Gabriella,
  • Pastori Daniele,
  • Fantauzzi Alessandra,
  • Massetti Paola,
  • Ceccarelli Giancarlo,
  • Ajassa Camilla,
  • Vullo Vincenzo,
  • Mezzaroma Ivano

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-341
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
p. 341

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The optimal therapeutic strategies for patients presenting with advanced disease at HIV-1 diagnosis are as yet incompletely defined. Methods All patients presenting at two outpatient clinics in 2000-2009 with an AIDS-defining clinical condition or a CD4+ T cell count 200 cells/μL and a plasma HIV-1 RNA copy number Results Among 102 evaluable patients, first-line regimens were protease inhibitors [PI]-based in 78 cases (77%) and efavirenz-based in 24 cases (23%). The overall response rate was 65% (95% CI: 55-74), with no differences by gender, age, nationality, route of transmission, hepatitis virus coinfections, presence of AIDS-defining clinical events, baseline HIV-1 viral load, or type of regimen (response rates with PI-based and efavirenz-based therapy: 63% and 71%, respectively, p = 0.474). Response rate was significantly better with higher baseline CD4+ T cell counts (78% with CD4+ ≥ 100/μL, compared to 50% with CD4+ Conclusions Our data indicate that a favorable immunovirological response is possible in the majority of naive patients presenting at HIV-1 diagnosis with AIDS or low CD4+ T cell counts, and confirm that starting HAART with a more compromised immune system may be associated with a delayed and sometimes partial immune recovery. Simpler regimens may be preferable in this particular population.