A systematic mapping review of links between handling wild meat and zoonotic diseases
Luke Tumelty,
Julia E. Fa,
Lauren Coad,
Sagan Friant,
Joseph Mbane,
Cedric Thibaut Kamogne,
Caleb Yengo Tata,
Amy Ickowitz
Affiliations
Luke Tumelty
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), CIFOR Headquarters, Bogor 16115, Indonesia
Julia E. Fa
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), CIFOR Headquarters, Bogor 16115, Indonesia; Department of Natural Sciences, School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UK; Corresponding author at: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), CIFOR Headquarters, Bogor 16115, Indonesia.
Lauren Coad
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), CIFOR Headquarters, Bogor 16115, Indonesia; Department of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK
Sagan Friant
Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States; Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States
Joseph Mbane
Center for International Forestry Research-World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Yaoundé, Cameroon
Cedric Thibaut Kamogne
Center for International Forestry Research-World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Yaoundé, Cameroon
Caleb Yengo Tata
Forests, Resources and People, FOREP, Limbe, Cameroon
Amy Ickowitz
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)-World Agroforestry Center, Beit Zayit, Israel
1. Hunting, trade, and consumption of wildlife present a serious threat to global public health as it places humans in close contact with zoonotic pathogens. 2. We systematically mapped the literature on wild meat handling and zoonotic disease transmission (1996–2022) using the online database Web of Science and Google search engine and identified 6229 articles out of which 253 were finally selected for use in our mapping review; 51 of these provided specific information regarding transmission risks. 3. The reviewed studies reported 43 zoonotic pathogens (17 bacteria, 15 viruses, and 11 parasites) that could pose a potential risk to human health. 4. Sixteen hygienic and sanitary behaviours were described in the reviewed studies. Disease surveillance was the most frequent. Most of the surveillance studies were carried out in Europe and were less common in the tropics. 5. To inform policy and practical actions effectively, it is imperative to broaden our understanding of how various mitigation behaviours can be employed to minimize the risk of transmission.