Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics (Jan 2024)

Repair of chronic and large rotator cuff tears using extra‐synovial autografts: An experimental study in rabbits

  • Iosafat Pinto,
  • Lazaros Kostretzis,
  • Konstantinos Katakalos,
  • George Kazakos,
  • Angeliki Cheva,
  • Athanasios Chatzisotiriou,
  • Pericles Papadopoulos,
  • Konstantinos Ditsios

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.12010
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose To investigate whether and how extra‐synovial autografts can enhance the reconstruction of chronic and large rotator cuff tears in a rabbit subscapularis model. Methods Twenty rabbits were used to create a large subscapularis tear bilaterally. Six weeks later, the right shoulder of each rabbit was operated to repair the tear with an extra‐synovial autograft, whereas the left shoulder did not undergo any surgery. At 6 and 12 weeks after the second procedure, the specimens underwent biomechanical and histological evaluation. Six more rabbits were used only as a normal reference. Results Biomechanical evaluation demonstrated that the ultimate load to failure of the Graft group (184.1 ± 35.7 N) was significantly higher (p = 0.04) than that of the Defect group (144.5 ± 32.2 N) at 12 weeks after repair, rising to 76% of the normal subscapularis tendon tensile strength. Histological analysis revealed an enhanced healing environment with neoangiogenesis and decreased inflammatory response at the repair site. Moreover, the tendon maturing score of the Graft group increased substantially from 6 (15.8 ± 0.9) to 12 (23.1 ± 0.6) weeks after repair (p = 0.01). Conclusion In vivo data support the efficacy of extra‐synovial autograft interposition in repairing chronic and large rotator cuff tears in a rabbit subscapularis model. The autografts were capable of enhancing the biomechanical properties of the repaired tendons, as evidenced by increased tensile strength, and forming new connective tissue simulating a fibrocartilage zone, as revealed by histological evaluation. Level of Evidence N/A.

Keywords