Diagnostics (Sep 2023)

Analytical Performance of a Novel Latex Turbidimetric Immunoassay, “Nanopia TARC”, for TARC/CCL17 Measurement: A Retrospective Observational Study

  • Keita Yamashita,
  • Shiori Takebayashi,
  • Wataru Murata,
  • Nao Hirai,
  • Yui Ito,
  • Mayuka Mitsui,
  • Mina Saito,
  • Kei Sato,
  • Miyuki Terada,
  • Noriyasu Niizeki,
  • Akira Suzuki,
  • Kenya Ogitani,
  • Toshihiko Fujikawa,
  • Marie Komori,
  • Nozomi Inoue,
  • Norimitsu Arai,
  • Masato Maekawa

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13182935
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 18
p. 2935

Abstract

Read online

Thymus- and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC, also known as CCL17) is used as a biomarker for atopic dermatitis. The methods currently used for its measurement are complex, time-consuming, and require large machinery, warranting the need for a method that is simple, has a quick turnaround time, and requires less complex machinery. We evaluated the analytical performance of a novel latex turbidimetric immunoassay method, “Nanopia TARC”, on 174 residual serum samples from patients with skin or allergic diseases. This evaluation included the assessment of the limit of blank/detection/quantification (LOB/D/Q), precision, accuracy, linearity, interference, and commutability between Nanopia TARC and “HISCL TARC”, based on the chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) method. The LOB/D/Q values were 13, 57, and 141 pg/mL, respectively. The coefficient of variation of the repeatability was 0.9–3.8%, and that of the intermediate precision was 2.1–5.4%. The total error of the accuracy was 1.9–13.4%. The linearity was 141 and 19,804 pg/mL for TARC. The correlation coefficient between Nanopia TARC and HISCL TARC determined using the Passing–Bablok regression analysis was 0.999. Furthermore, the concordance of diagnostic criteria with AD was 92%. Nanopia TARC was confirmed to have the same analytical performance for TARC measurement as the existing CLEIA method.

Keywords