Results in Engineering (Jun 2024)

Numerical investigation of nonlinear soil-structure interaction effects on response of irregular RC buildings

  • Nolaraj Poudel,
  • Hemchandra Chaulagain

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22
p. 102161

Abstract

Read online

Kathmandu, located in a high seismic zone, predominantly features irregular structures among its building stock. These structures are particularly susceptible to severe damage during seismic events, primarily due to torsional effects. Traditional seismic designs rely particularly on fixed-base conditions that underestimate forces and displacement primarily on soft soil conditions leading to irrational design practices. This study aims to quantify the seismic performance of buildings on various base conditions through fully nonlinear Soil-structure Interaction (SSI). The soil nonlinear behaviour was modelled using the Pressure-Independ-Multi-Yield (PIMY) material with an octahedral shear stress-strain backbone curve. Three distinct soil types were considered, and structures with irregular plan configurations were modelled using finite elements in both Opensees and STKO platforms. Structural performance was analyzed through nonlinear dynamic analysis, and outputs were evaluated based on seismic parameters. Comparing nonlinear SSI with linear SSI and fixed-base conditions revealed a significant increase in structural response, expressed in terms of displacement, drift ratio, and base shear. The magnitude of diaphragm rotation was found to be influenced by a combination of building torsional irregularity and SSI effects. It is suggested that the conventional practice of using the torsional irregularity ratio as a measure of torsional irregularity be revised and enhanced to better account for these influences. It has been quantified that torsional irregularity has a relatively lesser impact on displacements, drifts, and base shear compared to SSI. In all cases, fixed-base conditions consistently exhibited the minimum response. The study explored that linear SSI and fixed-base conditions tend to underestimate structural responses, while nonlinear SSI coupled with dynamic analysis provides a more accurate representation of realistic structural behaviour for seismic design particularly in soft soil cases.

Keywords