Frontiers in Psychology (Apr 2021)

Athlete Experiences of Shame and Guilt: Initial Psychometric Properties of the Athletic Perceptions of Performance Scale Within Junior Elite Cricketers

  • Simon M. Rice,
  • Simon M. Rice,
  • Matt S. Treeby,
  • Lisa Olive,
  • Lisa Olive,
  • Anna E. Saw,
  • Alex Kountouris,
  • Alex Kountouris,
  • Michael Lloyd,
  • Greg Macleod,
  • John W. Orchard,
  • John W. Orchard,
  • Peter Clarke,
  • Kate Gwyther,
  • Kate Gwyther,
  • Rosemary Purcell,
  • Rosemary Purcell

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.581914
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

Guilt and shame are self-conscious emotions with implications for mental health, social and occupational functioning, and the effectiveness of sports practice. To date, the assessment and role of athlete-specific guilt and shame has been under-researched. Reporting data from 174 junior elite cricketers (M = 17.34 years; females n = 85), the present study utilized exploratory factor analysis in validating the Athletic Perceptions of Performance Scale (APPS), assessing three distinct and statistically reliable factors: athletic shame-proneness, guilt-proneness, and no-concern. Conditional process analysis indicated that APPS shame-proneness mediated the relationship between general and athlete-specific distress (p < 0.01), with this pathway non-contingent on sex or past 12-month help-seeking for mental health concerns (p's > 0.05). While APPS domains of guilt-proneness and no-concern were not significant mediators, they exhibited correlations in the expected direction with indices of psychological distress and well-being. The APPS may assist coaches and support staff identify players who may benefit from targeted interventions to reduce the likelihood of experiencing shame-prone states.

Keywords