Urology Annals (Jan 2018)

Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma

  • Vishal Rao,
  • Gowri Garudadri,
  • Arya Sahithi Shilpa,
  • Daphne Fonseca,
  • S Murthy Sudha,
  • Rakesh Sharma,
  • T Rao Subramanyeshwar,
  • Sundaram Challa

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_185_17
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 3
pp. 324 – 329

Abstract

Read online

Context: New Gleason Score of Prostate. Aims: The aim of this study is to assign the patients with carcinoma prostate into new prognostic grade groups (PGGs) based on revised Gleason score (GS) and follow-up according to the WHO 2016. Subjects and Methods: All the biopsies/resected specimens of carcinoma prostate from January 2014 to June 2016 were reviewed, and GS was done according to the WHO 2016. Accordingly, cribriform, fused, and glomeruloid glands were assigned GS 4. Thus, two groups were identified with GS 7 (3 + 4 and 4 + 3). The patients were grouped into PGGs 1–5. The number of patients with change in the prognostic group along with follow-up was calculated. Results: There were 143 patients with carcinoma prostate, with a median age of 65 years. The initial GS was revised, and there was a decrease in GS 3 + 4 from 13.9% to 9% and increase in 4 + 3 from 19.6% to 23.8%. There was upgradation of PGG in 11 (7.69%) biopsies; with PGG from 1 to 2 in one; 2to 3 in eight; and 3to 4 in two. Follow-up at 2 years in 22 showed the poor prognoses in the patients who were upgraded to the higher prognostic group. Conclusions: A change in PGG according to the WHO 2016 criteria was assigned in 7.69% biopsies of carcinoma prostate, and it correlated with prognosis.

Keywords