AIMS Public Health (Jun 2022)

Protection motivation unmasked: Applying protection motivation theory to skepticism toward COVID-19 mask and vaccine mandates

  • Robin M. Kowalski,
  • Kenzie Hurley,
  • Nicholas Deas ,
  • Sophie Finnell,
  • Kelly Evans,
  • Chelsea Robbins,
  • Andrew Cook,
  • Emily Radovic,
  • Hailey Carroll,
  • Lyndsey Brewer,
  • Gabriela Mochizuki

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2022035
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 3
pp. 506 – 520

Abstract

Read online

Variants of COVID-19 have sparked controversy regarding mask and/or vaccine mandates in some sectors of the country. Many people hold polarized opinions about such mandates, and it is uncertain what predicts attitudes towards these protective behavior mandates. Through a snow-ball sampling procedure of respondents on social media platforms, this study examined skepticism of 774 respondents toward these mandates as a function of the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) of health. Hierarchical linear regressions examined Protection Motivation (PM) as a predictor of mask and vaccine mandate skepticism independently and with political party affiliation as a control. PM alone accounted for 76% of the variance in mask mandate skepticism, p 0.05. Specifically, the more severe participants perceived COVID-19 to be and the greater the perceived efficacy of masks and vaccines preventing the spread of COVID-19, the lower participants' skepticism toward mask and vaccine mandates. Similarly, the higher participants' self-efficacy in wearing masks or receiving the vaccine, the lower their skepticism toward mask and vaccine mandates.

Keywords