International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture (May 2024)

Investigation of the effect of materials and processing conditions in twin-screw extrusion

  • Navod Thyashan,
  • Yasith S. Perera,
  • Ruimin Xiao,
  • Chamil Abeykoon

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 3
pp. 353 – 361

Abstract

Read online

Three polymeric materials; polystyrene (amorphous), low-density polyethylene (semi-crystalline), and poly(methyl methacrylate) (amorphous) were used to explore their behavior and properties during processing using a co-rotating twin-screw extruder. Injection molding and compression molding were used for preparing the test specimens. Screw speed and barrel set temperatures were considered as the main processing variables while observing the process energy consumption of the extruder. The tensile, thermal, and rheological properties of the extruded materials under different processing conditions were evaluated. Test results confirmed that the motor power of the extruder for processing polystyrene and low-density polyethylene increased with increasing screw speed and decreased with increasing barrel set temperatures. Motor power for processing poly(methyl methacrylate) increased significantly with increasing screw speed. The total power consumption of the barrel heaters for processing polystyrene and low-density polyethylene slightly increased with the barrel set temperatures. The tensile modulus of polystyrene decreased with increasing screw speed at higher barrel set temperatures, while low-density polyethylene showed no significant variation. The tensile modulus of poly(methyl methacrylate) did not exhibit a clear trend with the extruder process settings. The effect of process settings on the glass transition temperature and melting temperature of the polymers was not significant, and no evidence was found of any molecular degradation during processing. Rheological properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) showed a significant variation with increasing screw speed and barrel set temperatures, while those of polystyrene and low-density polyethylene did not exhibit a consistent variation.

Keywords