SUATU TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP ALAT BUKTI DALAM PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG

Abstract

Money Laundering (hereinafter referred to as TPPU) is a runaway mode a sum of money from the proceeds of crime. Reports Results of analysis conducted by the Financial Transaction Analysis Reporting Center (hereinafter referred PPATK) is useful to provide some report suspicious accounts owned by state officials or individuals. They are suspected of committing crimes of Money Laundering regulated in Law Number 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Combating of Money Laundering. This report differs from a report in the criminal act of terrorism can be used as evidence in the beginning stages of the investigation sufficient to ensnare a person becomes a suspect. Studies in this study focused on the evidence and its development are reviewed judicially in the prevention of Money Laundering. This research used normative juridical research. The results of the study in response to a neighbor legal issues and developments are reviewed evidence legally in the prevention of money laundering (of Money Laundering) can be concluded that the LHA PPATK still being debated debate to be used as evidence in the context of judicial due to the absence of formal legal arrangements. Instead, the results of the comparative study of the United States and Germany can be concluded that the Audit Report (hereinafter referred LHA) can be used as evidence beginning to catch a suspect who is presumed to commit of Money Laundering which can then be level in the stage of prosecution and trial. The process of proving in court enforced inverted authentication system. Therefore, this report should be included as evidence in Article 175 RUUKUHAP, in addition to evidence in the form: evidence, letters, electronic evidence, expert testimony, the testimony of a witness, the testimony of the defendant and the judge observations.

Keywords

• Money Laundering Offences