The Effect of Exchanging a Mobile-Bearing into a Fixed-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement System in Patients with Coronal Plane Instability

Abstract

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The interface between the polyethylene (PE) inlay and the tibial component in mobile-bearing total ankle replacement (TAR) systems may allow the talus to seek its position according to the individual anatomy. However, chronic overload and/or incompetence of soft tissue may allow medial and/ or lateral translation of the talar component over time. This typically results in medial and/ or lateral gutter pain as well as pain along the syndesmosis. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of tibial component exchange and conversion from a mobile-bearing into a fixed-bearing TAR system in patients with coronal plane instabilities TAR. Methods: A consecutive series of 30 ankles (29 patients; age 65.6 [48.9 – 86.1]; male, 23; female, 7) with coronal plane instabilities underwent revision TAR with exchange of a mobile-bearing (Hintermann Series, H3) into a fixed-bearing (Hintermann Series, H2) TAR system. Patients presented with a medial (n = 12) or lateral (n = 9) translation of the talar component, or a varus (n = 4) or valgus (n = 5) instability with subsequent tilt of the talar component. After removing the tibial component and PE inlay, a tibial osteotomy was performed and 1 to 2 mm of the distal tibia removed. A tibial component of the H2 total ankle system was inserted. While holding the foot in neutral position, the PE inlay was locked to the tibial component in the appropriate position. Functional outcome and pain were recorded to evaluate clinical outcome, and standard radiographs under fluoroscopy were taken for radiographic assessment. Results: All but one of the remaining 28 patient showed significant improvement of pain (P<0.05). Preoperative gutter pain disappeared completely in 20 ankles (71.4%), and partially in 8 ankles (18.6%). The AOFAS Hindfoot Score improved from 54.3 (range, 21 to 90) preoperatively to 74.0 (range, 48 to 92) at latest follow-up (P<0.05). Radiographic assessment showed firm osteointegration in all patients with the talar component centralized in the ankle mortise, and a free medial and lateral gutter without tilt of talar component (Figure 1). One patient with bilateral revision TAR was affected by a bilateral deep infection of both ankles 9 months after surgery subsequent to a severe pneumonia. Both ankles were removed and replaced by a cement spacer. Conclusion: Converting a mobile-bearing into a fixed-bearing TAR system has shown to be effective in the treatment of patients with coronal plane instabilities following TAR. Allowing the PE inlay to adapt its position according to the talar component before definitive fixation to the tibial component of the H2 series, saved having to replace the talar component. Future long-term studies however are needed to identify significant benefits of this novel total ankle concept in primary and revision TAR.