Planta Daninha (Mar 2016)

Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.

  • G.L. FERREIRA,
  • D.T. SARAIVA,
  • G.P. QUEIROZ,
  • D.V. SILVA,
  • G.A.M. PEREIRA,
  • L.R. FERREIRA,
  • S.N. OLIVEIRA NETO,
  • E.M. MATTIELLO

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582016340100010
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 34, no. 1
pp. 99 – 107

Abstract

Read online Read online

The objective of this work was to evaluate the initial growth and the physiological characteristics of eucalypt submitted to different managements of signalgrass. The experiment was conducted in a protected environment, using a randomized blocks design with five repetitions. The treatments were arranged in a (5 x 2) + 1 factorial design, and the first factor corresponded to the types of weed management (no control; chemical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil; chemical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot; mechanical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil, and mechanical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot); the second factor corresponded to the two weeds species (U. brizantha and U. decumbens) and a control relative to the eucalypt in monoculture. The eucalypt growth was not affected by the presence of the Urochloa species until 50 days after treatments (DAT). However, the coexistence of these species with eucalypt for 107 DAT reduced the collar diameter, total dry matter, and the leaf area, but did not alter the characteristics related to photosynthesis and transpiration. The control method adopted, with removal or maintenance of the signalgrass shoot, regardless of species, did not change the initial eucalypt growth. It can be concluded that the coexistence of eucalypt with Urochloa decumbens or Urochloa brizantha for 105 days reduces the eucalypt growth. However, the use of chemical or mechanical control, with or without removal of signalgrass residue, were effective methods to prevent interference of these weeds.

Keywords