Diagnostics (Mar 2021)

Tumour Versus Germline <i>BRCA</i> Testing in Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Site Institution Experience in the United Kingdom

  • Iolia Akaev,
  • Siavash Rahimi,
  • Olubukola Onifade,
  • Francis John Edward Gardner,
  • David Castells-Rufas,
  • Eleanor Jones,
  • Shyamika Acharige,
  • Chit Cheng Yeoh

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030547
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 3
p. 547

Abstract

Read online

The aim of this audit was to evaluate the usefulness and serviceability of testing for pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes in ovarian cancer (OC) patients. One hundred and thirty-five patients with more common histological sub-types of OC were retrospectively identified between 2011 and 2019. The fail rate of the molecular analysis was 7.4% (10/135). One hundred and twenty-five records were evaluated: 99 (79.2%) patients had wild-type BRCA (both somatic and germline); tumour BRCA1/2 (tBRCA1/2) pathogenic mutations were found in 20 (16%) patients with distribution between BRCA1 and BRCA2 being 40% and 60%, respectively; 13 (10.4%) patients with pathogenic variants had germline mutations; and tBRCA1/2 with variant of unknown significance (VUS), in the absence of pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants, was detected in 6 (4.8%) patients. Our data show that expanding the molecular service to the routine first-tumour testing for patients with OC will potentially increase the detection rate of BRCA mutations, thereby providing early benefits of PARP inhibitors therapy. The tumour testing service should continue to be offered to newly diagnosed patients with high-grade epithelial cancers, including high-grade serous carcinoma, but also with carcinosarcomas and poorly-differentiated metastatic adenocarcinomas of unknown origin.

Keywords