PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Monitoring quality indicators for the Xpert MTB/RIF molecular assay in Ethiopia.

  • Abebaw Kebede,
  • Dereje Beyene,
  • Bazezew Yenew,
  • Getu Diriba,
  • Zemedu Mehamd,
  • Ayinalem Alemu,
  • Misikr Amare,
  • Gobena Ameni

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225205
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 11
p. e0225205

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionIn Ethiopia, >300 GeneXpert instruments have been deployed for tuberculosis (TB) testing using the Xpert MTB/RIF cartridge. Implementing quality indicators is necessary for monitoring and evaluating the quality of Xpert MTB/RIF diagnostic services.ObjectiveTo assess the use of quality indicators for the Xpert MTB/RIF molecular assay in Ethiopia and to compare the findings with the predefined targets described in the literature.MethodsClinical specimens collected from patients with suspected TB were subjected to Xpert MTB/RIF testing at the National TB Reference Laboratory (NTRL) between January and December 2018. Data were collected from GeneXpert software and Laboratory Information System (LIS) databases. Quality indicators were calculated and analyzed. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed using SPSS software version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).ResultsOf the 2515 specimens tested, 2274 (90.4%) had successful test results; 18.2% were positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). Among MTB positives (n = 413), 4.8% and 1.0% were rifampicin (RIF)-resistant and RIF-indeterminate cases, respectively. Unsuccessful results were 241 (9.6%); 8.9% of the total number of tests were errors, 0.04% had invalid results and 0.6% 'no result'. The most frequent error was probe check failure (error 5007). Instrument module A4, B2, B3, C3, and D3 (pConclusionMost of the quality indicators for the Xpert MTB/RIF molecular assay were maintained within the targets. However, the error rate and TAT were out of the targets. Defective modules and lacking experience were the factors affecting successful test outcomes.