Molecular Cytogenetics (Sep 2020)

Non-classical 1p36 deletion in a patient with Duane retraction syndrome: case report and literature review

  • Emiy Yokoyama,
  • Camilo E. Villarroel,
  • Sinhué Diaz,
  • Victoria Del Castillo,
  • Patricia Pérez-Vera,
  • Consuelo Salas,
  • Samuel Gómez,
  • Reneé Barreda,
  • Bertha Molina,
  • Sara Frias

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-020-00510-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Monosomy of 1p36 is considered the most common terminal microdeletion syndrome. It is characterized by intellectual disability, growth retardation, seizures, congenital anomalies, and distinctive facial features that are absent when the deletion is proximal, beyond the 1p36.32 region. In patients with proximal deletions, little is known about the associated phenotype, since only a few cases have been reported in the literature. Ocular manifestations in patients with classical 1p36 monosomy are frequent and include strabismus, myopia, hypermetropia, and nystagmus. However, as of today only one patient with 1p36 deletion and Duane retraction syndrome (DRS) has been reported. Case presentation We describe a patient with intellectual disability, facial dysmorphism, and bilateral Duane retraction syndrome (DRS) type 1. Array CGH showed a 7.2 Mb de novo deletion from 1p36.31 to 1p36.21. Discussion Our patient displayed DRS, which is not part of the classical phenotype and is not a common clinical feature in 1p36 deletion syndrome; we hypothesized that this could be associated with the overlapping deletion between the distal and proximal 1p36 regions. DRS is one of the Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders, and a genetic basis for the syndrome has been extensively reported. The HES3 gene is located at 1p36.31 and could be associated with oculomotor alterations, including DRS, since this gene is involved in the development of the 3rd cranial nerve and the 6th cranial nerve’s nucleus. We propose that oculomotor anomalies, including DRS, could be related to proximal 1p36 deletion, warranting a detailed ophthalmologic evaluation of these patients.

Keywords