Evolution Letters (Aug 2022)

Sex‐specific natural selection on SNPs in Silene latifolia

  • Lynda F. Delph,
  • Keely E. Brown,
  • Luis Diego Ríos,
  • John K. Kelly

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.283
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 4
pp. 308 – 318

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Selection that acts in a sex‐specific manner causes the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Sex‐specific phenotypic selection has been demonstrated in many taxa and can be in the same direction in the two sexes (differing only in magnitude), limited to one sex, or in opposing directions (antagonistic). Attempts to detect the signal of sex‐specific selection from genomic data have confronted numerous difficulties. These challenges highlight the utility of “direct approaches,” in which fitness is predicted from individual genotype within each sex. Here, we directly measured selection on Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in a natural population of the sexually dimorphic, dioecious plant, Silene latifolia. We measured flowering phenotypes, estimated fitness over one reproductive season, as well as survival to the next year, and genotyped all adults and a subset of their offspring for SNPs across the genome. We found that while phenotypic selection was congruent (fitness covaried similarly with flowering traits in both sexes), SNPs showed clear evidence for sex‐specific selection. SNP‐level selection was particularly strong in males and may involve an important gametic component (e.g., pollen competition). While the most significant SNPs under selection in males differed from those under selection in females, paternity selection showed a highly polygenic tradeoff with female survival. Alleles that increased male mating success tended to reduce female survival, indicating sexual antagonism at the genomic level. Perhaps most importantly, this experiment demonstrates that selection within natural populations can be strong enough to measure sex‐specific fitness effects of individual loci.

Keywords