Frontiers in Psychiatry (Apr 2023)

Inequality and barriers in psychosis prevention: A systematic review on clinical high-risk for psychosis studies from developing countries

  • Alexandre Andrade Loch,
  • Alexandre Andrade Loch,
  • Ana Caroline Lopes-Rocha,
  • Feten Fekih-Romdhane,
  • Feten Fekih-Romdhane,
  • Martinus Theodorus van de Bilt,
  • Martinus Theodorus van de Bilt,
  • Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo,
  • Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo,
  • Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo,
  • Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo,
  • Paolo Fusar-Poli,
  • Paolo Fusar-Poli,
  • Paolo Fusar-Poli

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1148862
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR) paradigm is one of the best studied preventive paradigms in psychiatry. However, most studies have been conducted in high-income countries. It is unclear if knowledge from such countries applies to low and middle-income countries (LAMIC), and if there are specific limitations hindering CHR research there. Our aim is to systematically review studies on CHR from LAMIC.MethodsA multistep PRISMA-compliant literature search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science for articles published until 1/03/2022, conducted in LAMIC, addressing the concept and correlates of CHR. Study characteristics as well as limitations were reported. Corresponding authors of the included studies were invited to answer an online poll. Quality assessment was done with the MMAT.ResultsA total of 109 studies were included in the review: none from low-income countries, 8 from lower middle-income countries, and 101 from upper middle-income countries. The most frequent limitations were small sample size (47.9%), cross-sectional design (27.1%), and follow-up issues (20.8%). Mean quality of included studies was of 4.4. Out of the 43 corresponding authors, 12 (27.9%) completed the online poll. They cited further limitations as few financial resources (66.7%), no involvement of population (58.2%) and cultural barriers (41.7%). Seventy five percent researchers reported that CHR research should be conducted differently in LAMIC compared to high-income countries, due to structural and cultural issues. Stigma was mentioned in three out of five sections of the poll.DiscussionResults show the discrepancy of available evidence on CHR in LAMIC, given the shortage of resources in such countries. Future directions should aim to increase the knowledge on individuals at CHR in such settings, and to address stigma and cultural factors that may play a role in the pathways toward care in psychosis.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=316816, CRD42022316816.

Keywords