Journal of Clinical Medicine (Feb 2024)

Medial or Lateral, That Is the Question: A Retrospective Study to Compare Two Injection Techniques in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain with Hyaluronic Acid

  • Giacomo Farì,
  • Rachele Mancini,
  • Laura Dell’Anna,
  • Vincenzo Ricci,
  • Simone Della Tommasa,
  • Francesco Paolo Bianchi,
  • Ilaria Ladisa,
  • Carlo De Serio,
  • Silvia Fiore,
  • Danilo Donati,
  • Maurizio Ranieri,
  • Andrea Bernetti,
  • Marisa Megna

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041141
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 4
p. 1141

Abstract

Read online

Background: Mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (KOA) can be successfully treated using intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA-HA). The medial infrapatellar (MIP) approach and lateral infrapatellar (LIP) approach are two of the most used techniques for performing IA-HA, but it is still not clear which one is preferable. Objectives: The study aims to find the best knee injection technique between MIP and LIP approaches. Methods: In total, 161 patients were enrolled, divided into two groups (MIP or LIP). Each technique was performed once a week for three weeks. Patients were evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Roles and Maudsley Score (RMS) at T0 (before the first injection), T1 (one week after the third injection) and T2 (six months after). Results: NRS, KOOS and RMS showed a statistically significant improvement in both groups at all the detection times, without significant differences. No differences were detected between the groups in terms of systemic effect effusions, while the MIP group presented a mildly higher number of bruises in comparison with the LIP group (p = 0.034). Conclusions: Both the IA-HA techniques are equally effective in measured outcomes. The MIP approach seems to produce some local and transient side effects. So, the choice of the LIP or MIP approach depends on the operator’s skill and experience.

Keywords