Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Apr 2024)

Signal-averaged electrocardiography as a noninvasive tool for evaluating the ventricular substrate in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy: reassessment of an old tool

  • Dinh Son Ngoc Nguyen,
  • Dinh Son Ngoc Nguyen,
  • Chin-Yu Lin,
  • Chin-Yu Lin,
  • Fa-Po Chung,
  • Fa-Po Chung,
  • Ting-Yung Chang,
  • Ting-Yung Chang,
  • Li-Wei Lo,
  • Li-Wei Lo,
  • Yenn-Jiang Lin,
  • Yenn-Jiang Lin,
  • Shih-Lin Chang,
  • Shih-Lin Chang,
  • Yu-Feng Hu,
  • Yu-Feng Hu,
  • Ta-Chuan Tuan,
  • Ta-Chuan Tuan,
  • Tze-Fan Chao,
  • Tze-Fan Chao,
  • Jo-Nan Liao,
  • Jo-Nan Liao,
  • Ling Kuo,
  • Ling Kuo,
  • Chih-Min Liu,
  • Chih-Min Liu,
  • Shin-Huei Liu,
  • Shin-Huei Liu,
  • Cheng-I Wu,
  • Cheng-I Wu,
  • Ming-Jen Kuo,
  • Guan-Yi Li,
  • Yu-Shan Huang,
  • Shang-Ju Wu,
  • Shang-Ju Wu,
  • Yoon Kee Siow,
  • Yoon Kee Siow,
  • Jose Antonio L. Bautista,
  • Jose Antonio L. Bautista,
  • Dat Tran Cao,
  • Dat Tran Cao,
  • Shih-Ann Chen,
  • Shih-Ann Chen,
  • Shih-Ann Chen,
  • Shih-Ann Chen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1306055
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionSignal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) provides diagnostic and prognostic information regarding cardiac diseases. However, its value in other nonischemic cardiomyopathies (NICMs) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the role of SAECG in patients with NICM.Methods and resultsThis retrospective study included consecutive patients with NICM who underwent SAECG, biventricular substrate mapping, and ablation for ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Patients with baseline ventricular conduction disturbances were excluded. Patients who fulfilled at least one SAECG criterion were categorized into Group 1, and the other patients were categorized into Group 2. Baseline and ventricular substrate characteristics were compared between the two groups. The study included 58 patients (39 men, mean age 50.4 ± 15.5 years), with 34 and 24 patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Epicardial mapping was performed in eight (23.5%) and six patients (25.0%) in Groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.897), respectively. Patients in Group 1 had a more extensive right ventricular (RV) low-voltage zone (LVZ) and scar area than those in Group 2. Group 1 had a larger epicardial LVZ than Group 2. Epicardial late potentials were more frequent in Group 1 than in Group 2. There were more arrhythmogenic foci within the RV outflow tract in Group 1 than in Group 2. There was no significant difference in long-term VA recurrence.ConclusionIn our NICM population, a positive SAECG was associated with a larger RV endocardial scar, epicardial scar/late potentials, and a higher incidence of arrhythmogenic foci in the RV outflow tract.

Keywords