Indian Heart Journal (Dec 2018)

Predictors of short-term outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating STEMI—A tertiary care center experience

  • Deep Chandh Raja,
  • Aashish Chopra,
  • Vijayakumar Subban,
  • Rashmi Maharajan,
  • Harini Anandhan,
  • Nandhakumar Vasu,
  • Jawahar Farook,
  • Ramachandran Paramasivam,
  • Srinivasan Narayanan,
  • Kalaichelvan Uthayakumaran,
  • Balaji Pakshirajan,
  • Suma Victor,
  • Ramkumar Solirajaram,
  • Jaishankar Krishnamoorthy,
  • Ezhilan Janakiraman,
  • Ulhas M. Pandurangi,
  • Latchumanadhas Kalidoss,
  • Ajit Sankaradas Mullasari

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 70
pp. S259 – S264

Abstract

Read online

Background: Studying the outcomes in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (CS-STEMI) and undergoing primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may give an insight to the unmet needs in STEMI-care in our region and may help in future recommendations in improving survival. Materials and methodolgy: During the period from January 2001- June 2017, there were 114 patients included in the study. The demographic, clinical and angiographic characteristics were compared between the survivors and non-survivors. All these variables were also compared between two-time frames (Phase 1- January 2001 to June 2007; Phase 2- July 2007 to June 2017). Results: Among patients undergoing PCI for STEMI, 7.5% were in cardiogenic shock. In-hospital mortality for the patients included in the study was 53.5%. Total ischemic time (OR = 0.99, 0.99–1; p = 0.02), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR = 0.90, 0.82–0.98; p = 0.02), need for cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (OR = 0.12, 0.24–0.66; p = 0.01), and post PCI TIMI flows (OR = 0.08, 0.02–0.29; p < 0.001) were the significant determinants of in-hospital mortality in the regression analysis. There was no significant change in mortality between the two phases of the study, though there was a reduction in total ischemic and door-to-balloon times, transfer admissions, use of thrombolytics, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, intra-aortic balloon pump, and mechanical ventilation in phase 2. Conclusion: Patients presenting in CS-STEMI and undergoing PCI continue to experience high mortality rates, despite improvements in total ischemic times. Further improvement in the systems-of-care are required to bring about reduction in mortality in this high-risk subset. Keywords: STEMI, Cardiogenic shock, Primary PCI, Mortality, TIMI flow