Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (Jun 2023)

Limited efficacy of APRIL CAR in patients with multiple myeloma indicate challenges in the use of natural ligands for CAR T-cell therapy

  • Simon Thomas,
  • Julia Taylor,
  • Manuel Rodriguez-Justo,
  • Kwee Yong,
  • Mathieu Ferrari,
  • Shimobi Onuoha,
  • Sonja Zweegman,
  • Rakesh Popat,
  • Lydia Lee,
  • Wen Chean Lim,
  • Daria Galas-Filipowicz,
  • Kent Fung,
  • Dominic Patel,
  • Zulaikha Akbar,
  • Elena Alvarez Mediavilla,
  • Patrycja Wawrzyniecka,
  • Debarati Shome,
  • Rogier M Reijmers,
  • Trillian Gregg,
  • Leigh Wood,
  • William Day,
  • Virginie Cerec,
  • Shaun Cordoba,
  • Nushmia Khokhar,
  • Vijay Peddareddigari,
  • Muhammad Al-Hajj,
  • Jim Cavet,
  • Martin Pule

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2023-006699
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 6

Abstract

Read online

Background We used a proliferating ligand (APRIL) to construct a ligand-based third generation chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) able to target two myeloma antigens, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and transmembrane activator and CAML interactor.Methods The APRIL CAR was evaluated in a Phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03287804, AUTO2) in patients with relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma. Eleven patients received 13 doses, the first 15×106 CARs, and subsequent patients received 75,225,600 and 900×106 CARs in a 3+3 escalation design.Results The APRIL CAR was well tolerated. Five (45.5%) patients developed Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome and there was no neurotoxicity. However, responses were only observed in 45.5% patients (1×very good partial response, 3×partial response, 1×minimal response). Exploring the mechanistic basis for poor responses, we then compared the APRIL CAR to two other BCMA CARs in a series of in vitro assays, observing reduced interleukin-2 secretion and lack of sustained tumor control by APRIL CAR regardless of transduction method or co-stimulatory domain. There was also impaired interferon signaling of APRIL CAR and no evidence of autoactivation. Thus focusing on APRIL itself, we confirmed similar affinity to BCMA and protein stability in comparison to BCMA CAR binders but reduced binding by cell-expressed APRIL to soluble BCMA and reduced avidity to tumor cells. This indicated either suboptimal folding or stability of membrane-bound APRIL attenuating CAR activation.Conclusions The APRIL CAR was well tolerated, but the clinical responses observed in AUTO2 were disappointing. Subsequently, when comparing the APRIL CAR to other BCMA CARs, we observed in vitro functional deficiencies due to reduced target binding by cell-expressed ligand.