Neurological Research and Practice (Aug 2024)

User expectations and experiences of an assistive robotic arm in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a multicenter observational study

  • Susanne Spittel,
  • Thomas Meyer,
  • Ute Weyen,
  • Torsten Grehl,
  • Patrick Weydt,
  • Robert Steinbach,
  • Susanne Petri,
  • Petra Baum,
  • Moritz Metelmann,
  • Anne-Dorte Sperfeld,
  • Dagmar Kettemann,
  • Jenny Norden,
  • Annekathrin Rödiger,
  • Benjamin Ilse,
  • Julian Grosskreutz,
  • Barbara Hildebrandt,
  • Bertram Walter,
  • Christoph Münch,
  • André Maier

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-024-00342-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective Robotic arms are innovative assistive devices for ALS patients with progressive motor deficits of arms and hands. The objective was to explore the patients´ expectations towards a robotic arm system and to assess the actual experiences after the provision of the device. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted at 9 ALS centers in Germany. ALS-related functional deficits were assessed using the ALS-Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRS-R). Motor deficit of the upper limbs was determined using a subscore of three arm-related items of the ALSFRS-R (items 4–6; range 0–12 points). User expectations before provision (expectation group, n = 85) and user experiences after provision (experience group, n = 14) with the device (JACO Assistive Robotic Device, Kinova, Boisbriand, QC, Canada) were assessed. Results In the total cohort, mean ALSFRS-R subscore for arm function was 1.7 (SD: 2.0, 0–9) demonstrating a severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. In the expectation group (n = 85), the following use cases of the robotic arm have been prioritized: handling objects (89%), close-body movements (88%), pressing buttons (87%), serving drinks (86%), and opening cabinets and doors (85%). In the experience group (n = 14), handling objects (79%), serving drinks (79%), near-body movements (71%), pushing buttons (71%), serving food (64%), and opening doors (64%) were the most frequent used cases. Most patients used the device daily (71.4%, n = 10), and 28.6% (n = 4) several times a week. All patients of the experience group found the device helpful, felt safe while using the device, and were satisfied with its reliability. NPS of the assistive robotic arm revealed 64% "promoters" (strong recommendation), 29% "indifferents" (uncertain recommendation) and 7% "detractors" (no recommendation). Total NPS was + 57 demonstrating strong patient satisfaction. Conclusions Initiation of procurement with a robotic assistive arm was confined to patients with severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. User experience underlined the wide spectrum of use cases of assistive robotic arms in ALS. The positive user experience together with high satisfaction underscore that robotic arm systems serve as a valuable treatment option in ALS patients with severe motor deficits of the arms.

Keywords