BMC Gastroenterology (Aug 2024)

The role of marital status in gallbladder cancer: a real-world competing risk analysis

  • Haimin Jin,
  • Danwei Du,
  • Yangyang Xie,
  • Haijuan Jin,
  • Jinfei Tong,
  • Binbin Li,
  • Weijian Chu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03364-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The association between marital status and gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to verify the relationship between marital status and GBC and construct a prognostic nomogram to predict the impact of marital status on GBC patients. Method GBC patients were divided into married and unmarried groups using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We employed competing risk analyses, propensity score matching (PSM), and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. The relationship between marital status and GBC was then verified, and the predicted nomogram was constructed. Results A total of 3913 GBC patients were obtained from the SEER database, and an additional 76 GBC patients from Hangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital were selected as the external validation group. The competing risk analysis revealed a significant disparity in the 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death (CSD) between the two cohorts (59.1% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.003). Furthermore, the multivariate competing hazards regression analysis identified a significant association (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04–1.31; p = 0.007) between marital status and CSD. To assess the 1-, 3-, and 5-year risks of CSD, a comprehensive competing event nomogram was constructed using factors derived from the multivariate analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year training cohorts were 0.806, 0.785, and 0.776, respectively. In the internal validation cohort, these values were 0.798, 0.790, and 0.790, while the external validation cohort exhibited AUC values of 0.748, 0.835, and 0.883 for the corresponding time intervals. Furthermore, calibration curves demonstrated a commendable level of concordance between the observed and predicted probabilities of CSD. Conclusion Marriage was a protective factor for GBC patients after taking competing risk into consideration. The proposed nomogram demonstrated exceptional predictive power.

Keywords