PLoS ONE (Jul 2010)

Comparison of HIV-1 genotypic resistance test interpretation systems in predicting virological outcomes over time.

  • Dineke Frentz,
  • Charles A B Boucher,
  • Matthias Assel,
  • Andrea De Luca,
  • Massimiliano Fabbiani,
  • Francesca Incardona,
  • Pieter Libin,
  • Nino Manca,
  • Viktor Müller,
  • Breanndán O Nualláin,
  • Roger Paredes,
  • Mattia Prosperi,
  • Eugenia Quiros-Roldan,
  • Lidia Ruiz,
  • Peter M A Sloot,
  • Carlo Torti,
  • Anne-Mieke Vandamme,
  • Anne-Mieke Vandamme,
  • Kristel Van Laethem,
  • Maurizio Zazzi,
  • David A M C van de Vijver

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011505
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 7
p. e11505

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundSeveral decision support systems have been developed to interpret HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping results. This study compares the ability of the most commonly used systems (ANRS, Rega, and Stanford's HIVdb) to predict virological outcome at 12, 24, and 48 weeks.Methodology/principal findingsIncluded were 3763 treatment-change episodes (TCEs) for which a HIV-1 genotype was available at the time of changing treatment with at least one follow-up viral load measurement. Genotypic susceptibility scores for the active regimens were calculated using scores defined by each interpretation system. Using logistic regression, we determined the association between the genotypic susceptibility score and proportion of TCEs having an undetectable viral load (Conclusions/significanceThree commonly used HIV drug resistance interpretation systems ANRS, Rega and HIVdb predict virological response at 12, 24, and 48 weeks, after change of treatment to the same extent.