Measurement: Sensors (Aug 2024)

Measurement of respiratory rate with cardiac belt: Metrological characterization

  • Luna Panni,
  • Gloria Cosoli,
  • Luca Antognoli,
  • Lorenzo Scalise

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 34
p. 101244

Abstract

Read online

The rapid growth of available wearable technologies, particularly in the healthcare sector, has ushered in a new era of digital health. This progress has introduced new possibilities for the monitoring of vital signs, including breathing rate (BR). BR is a crucial health parameter used to assess an individual's overall well-being; specifically, it can be considered a precise indicator of pathological conditions and stressors. The aim of this study is to conduct a metrological characterization of one of the most widely used BR sensors for the measurement of BR (i.e., Zephyr BioHarness 3.0), comparing it to a BR gold standard monitor (i.e., a spirometer), in determined test conditions, including both natural and defined BR patterns. Additionally, the Monte Carlo method (MCM) was applied to evaluate the propagation of the measurement uncertainty in the identification of the peaks of respiratory signal, used to calculate BR. Results reveal that the Zephyr BioHarness 3.0 sensor provides highly accurate BR measurements, with a precision of ±1 bpm. Bland-Altman analysis indicates a 95 % confidence interval of [-2; 3] bpm, demonstrating a close agreement with the reference instrument. The Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.95 further validates the linear correlation between the reference/test measurements. The simulation based on MCM provides an expanded uncertainty of ±2 bpm (coverage factor k = 2) in BR estimation due to the uncertainty in the peaks identification (compatible with the accuracy provided by the manufacturer). These results highlight the Zephyr BioHarness 3.0 sensor reliability for BR monitoring while emphasizing the significance of accounting for different disturbing factors, e.g., uncertainty in peak detection during data analysis, also to provide a rigorous level of confidence in the measurement results, hence being able to properly interpret them in biomedical applications.

Keywords