PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Baseline situational analysis in Bangladesh, Jordan, Paraguay, the Philippines, Ukraine, and Zimbabwe for the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health: Universal Health Coverage for Mental Health

  • Christopher G. Kemp,
  • Tessa Concepcion,
  • Helal Uddin Ahmed,
  • Nazneen Anwar,
  • Florence Baingana,
  • Ian M. Bennett,
  • Andrea Bruni,
  • Dan Chisholm,
  • Hania Dawani,
  • Marcia Erazo,
  • Saima Wazed Hossain,
  • James January,
  • Alisa Ladyk-Bryzghalova,
  • Hasina Momotaz,
  • Edmore Munongo,
  • Renato Oliveira e Souza,
  • Giovanni Sala,
  • Alison Schafer,
  • Oleksii Sukhovii,
  • Luis Taboada,
  • Mark Van Ommeren,
  • Ann Vander Stoep,
  • Jasmine Vergara,
  • Chloe Waters,
  • Devora Kestel,
  • Pamela Y. Collins

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

Introduction Mental, neurological and substance use conditions lead to tremendous suffering, yet globally access to effective care is limited. In line with the 13th General Programme of Work (GPW 13), in 2019 the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health: Universal Health Coverage for Mental Health to advance mental health policies, advocacy, and human rights and to scale up access to quality and affordable care for people living with mental health conditions. Six countries were selected as ‘early-adopter’ countries for the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health in the initial phase. Our objective was to rapidly and comprehensively assess the strength of mental health systems in each country with the goal of informing national priority-setting at the outset of the Initiative. Methods We used a modified version of the Program for Improving Mental Health Care (PRIME) situational analysis tool. We used a participatory process to document national demographic and population health characteristics; environmental, sociopolitical, and health-related threats; the status of mental health policies and plans; the prevalence of mental disorders and treatment coverage; and the availability of resources for mental health. Results Each country had distinct needs, though several common themes emerged. Most were dealing with crises with serious implications for population mental health. None had sufficient mental health services to meet their needs. All aimed to decentralize and deinstitutionalize mental health services, to integrate mental health care into primary health care, and to devote more financial and human resources to mental health systems. All cited insufficient and inequitably distributed specialist human resources for mental health as a major impediment. Conclusions This rapid assessment facilitated priority-setting for mental health system strengthening by national stakeholders. Next steps include convening design workshops in each country and initiating monitoring and evaluation procedures.