Geologia USP. Série Científica (Apr 2016)

Contribution to the geology, geochemistry and petrography of mafic dykes from the central-east portion of Rondônia, SW Amazonian Craton

  • Gil Barreto Trindade Netto,
  • Paulo César Corrêa da Costa,
  • Vicente Antonio Vitório Girardi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9095.v16i1p3-21
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Two types of mafic dykes occur in the central-east portion of Rondônia State, in the SW Amazonian Craton. They are located at the interface between two geochronological provinces and distinct tectonic terrains (Rio Negro-Juruena and Sunsas-Aguapei Provinces, Jamari Terrain and Nova Brasilandia Terrain, respectively) and are separated by the Pimento Bueno paleozoic graben. They are named diabase I and diabase II. Diabase I trends predominantly WNW-ESE, and subordinately NW-SE, and crosscut proterozoic rocks from Migrantopolis and Terra Boa Formations and from the Intrusive Suite of Serra da Providência. Diabase II is more widespread in the region and trends mainly N-S and NNE-SSW, and subordinately WSW-ESE. This swarm crosscuts both proterozoic (Migrantinópolis and Terra Boa formations), and paleozoic rocks (Pedra Redonda and Pimenta Bueno formations). The main petrographic differences refers to the presence of orthopyroxene only in the diabase II samples, and different textures, predominately equigranular, in diabase I, and frequently porphyritic and microporphyritic in diabase II. Geochemically, both types are classified as tholeiitic basalts. Diabase I (mg# 0.35 – 0.71) is more enriched in FeO, TiO2 , K2 O, P2 O5 and in incompatible elements in comparison with diabase II (mg# 0.40 – 0.60). The difference between enrichment degree of both melts and the clear distinction between incompatible element ratios indicate that diabase I and diabase II originate from different parent mantles. The great similarity between contents and incompatible element ratios of diabase I dykes and metagabbros from the Nova Brasilândia Group (1.10 Ga) suggest that both melts originate from similar sources, and forthcoming researches should take into account the possibility of similar intrusion ages. The geological setting of the diabase II swarm suggests that these intrusions could be mesozoic. Geologic and geochemical data indicate an intracontinental setting for both swarms

Keywords